Court Approves Harrassment of Voters

Unfortunately the Republicans have asked for something that is out of line- even though it is for a good reason.

The Cincinatti Enquirer reports:

Republicans favor the challengers, arguing that they would help prevent voter fraud, while Democrats claim the GOP is trying to intimidate minorities and other voters who tend to cast ballots for Democrats.

Although the lower courts declared the challengers were unconstitutional and could cause chaos at the polls, the two appeals court judges said the state law passes constitutional muster.

I disagree with the techniques the Republicans want to use, but I do have a concern with the DemocRATS trying to cheat and steal an elecetion (something they almost succeeded in doing back in 2000).

The charges of intimidation by DemocRATS are a joke, it is a defense by DemocRATS who undoubtedly will try to cheat and commit voter fraud today.

Finally, it is not unconstitutional. This does not speak to the Constitution. Just as Roe v. Wade is not a Constitutional issue- it is state-sanctioned murder.

UPDATE: If my information is correct, they do not require photo uidentification to vote in Ohio- a DemocRAT push. The Republican tactics might be to bring the identification back into play within this insanity.